
By Vincent Mallozzi
To sum this up in one word -- gush.
Vincent Mallozzi's biography of Julius Erving, "Doc," is a rather stunningly uninsightful look at someone who should have been a fascinating subject for a biography.
And it takes less than a chapter to find out the reason why. Mallozzi, a reporter for the New York Times, grew up idolizing the fabulous Dr. J, and jumped into this project with enthusiasm. But he didn't carry any objectivity with him, and after a while the hero worship just wears the reader down.
Erving probably has turned into something of an underrated superstar in some basketball history circles. He came out of Long Island to play for the Univesity of Massachusetts, where he blossomed into a college standout. But, UMass wasn't exactly a place to get noticed in those days, even though it became obvious pretty quickly that Erving could play on any court in the world and hold his own.
After his junior year, Erving jumped to the professional ranks, which was unusual at that time. He signed with the ABA's Virginia Squires, which wasn't exactly "America's Team" back then either. He then went on to the New York Nets where he led the team to a couple of championships.
Erving's time in the ABA is the key to his story. When he was at his best in that part of his career, when he did soar with the birds, few were watching. The league didn't have a national television contract, and highlights were shown anywhere in those pre-ESPN days. So he became something of a legend, one that many had discussed but few had seen on a national level. Was he the last superstar to meet that description? Maybe.
Erving's mere presence certainly helped drive the NBA-ABA merger in 1976, but Erving got into a contract dispute and was traded to Philadelphia. There he didn't quite sore as high as often, but was still mighty good -- good enough to lead the Sixers to one NBA title and two other appearances in the Finals. Mallozzi even rips into a Sports Illustrated writer (only called "Taylor" in a typo) for daring to suggest that Erving's game in the NBA didn't match his ABA play -- even though others in the book make essentially the same point.
You think this book would be filled with descriptions of memorable games and great plays in big situations, but it really isn't. Whole seasons go by in just a few paragraphs. The 1977 Final against Portland was practically an opera -- the overly talented Sixers, with plenty of stars but only one ball, vs. the Blazers, with Bill Walton and a brilliant supporting cast that was underrated by most. It gets less than four pages in the book. The author also makes a few factual obvious errors along the way in the text.
What, then, fills up the pages if basketball doesn't do it? Tributes to the Doctor. Long, glowing tributes from friends, coaches, opponents and teammates, dating back to his school days. By any standard, all of them seem to be deserved. Erving was a winner who wasn't selfish, carried himself with class on the court, and was great with fans. Dunking didn't begin with Michael Jordan, oh young fans.
Erving's basketball career ends on page 187, and the book goes on to page 278. What could fill it? A few more tributes, as you'd expect, and some details of Erving's life since retirement from basketball. To be fair, Mallozzi does cover the details of Erving's illegitimate children. Well, no one thought Tiger Woods invented bad behavior by athletes.
In the end, Mallozzi writes that "this entire book is basically a giant Valentine from one of his biggest fans." He later adds, "My only hope is that he enjoys this book as much as I enjoyed writing it."
Maybe the next book will be written for its readers, instead of the Good Doctor. "Doc" doesn't measure up.
Two stars.
Learn more about this book.





